Operated from Belgium
No ads · no accounts · no cookies

PlainRecord

Clear accounts of documented events, with visible sources, explicit limitations, and transparent corrections.

Earlier record, added at launch

This record already existed when PlainRecord first read this source. It is published here for completeness and is not a newly occurring event.

European Court of Human Rights judgments · European Court of Human Rights judgments

European Court of Human Rights delivered judgment against Italy in CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY

On 3 September 2026 a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered judgment in CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY (applications no. 23169/16, 23834/18, 37683/19, 17937/20).

On 3 September 2026 a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered judgment in a case it titles “CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY”, brought against Italy under applications no. 23169/16, 23834/18, 37683/19, 17937/20.

The Court recorded a violation of Article 7 of the Convention. Article 3 appears in both findings: the Court recorded a violation in one respect and no violation in another. Neither half of that is reported here without the other, and which limb is which is stated in the Court's conclusion below.

The Court states its conclusion as: “Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Nulla poena sine lege;Nullum crimen sine lege);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary…”

The wording in quotation marks above is the Court's own conclusion, reproduced so that the finding can be checked against the record. It is not this service's summary of the judgment.

This record establishes that the Court delivered this judgment on 3 September 2026 and what it recorded as its findings. It does not establish anything about the underlying events beyond what the Court found, it does not report what either party said, and it does not state what follows for Italy or for anyone else. A Chamber judgment may be referred to the Grand Chamber and is not necessarily the end of the case.

Times

These are different things and are not interchangeable.

Event occurred
3 September 2026, 00:00 UTC (as recorded by the source)
Published here
12 September 2026, 02:10 UTC

Evidence

Record identifier
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0903JUD002316916
Retrieved
12 September 2026, 14:23 UTC
Snapshot checksum
ecc154766543f47a1d08671fcd77da40798d158d6b85685788c04b880980520a
Attribution
Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, from HUDOC. (C) ECHR-CEDH. — ECHR copyright and disclaimer
Where each figure above comes from (9 values)
ValueAs publishedOriginSource field or calculation
Case name, as the Court titles it CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY field docname
Application numbers 23169/16, 23834/18, 37683/19, 17937/20 field appno
Several applications joined into one judgment.
Respondent State Italy calculation country name for ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code ITA
Date of judgment 2026-09-03 field kpdate
Bench Chamber field doctypebranch
Conclusion, in the Court's own words Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Nulla poena sine lege;Nullum crimen sine lege);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) field conclusion
Reproduced from the Court's record so that the finding can be checked against it. It is not this service's summary.
European Case Law Identifier ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0903JUD002316916 field ecli
Identifies the judgment rather than one language version of it. HUDOC publishes an English and a French record per judgment.
Articles the Court recorded a violation of 7 calculation article numbers taken from each code before the first '-' or '+'
Articles recorded in both findings 3 calculation articles appearing in both the violation and non-violation lists
The Court found a violation on one limb of the article and none on another. Neither finding is reported without the other.

Wording template echr_judgment version 1.0.

Revision history

  • 12 September 2026, 02:10 UTC — First publication

    Assembled from the source record listed under evidence. This record predates the start of this service's coverage and was added when the source was first read.

Limits of this brief

Chamber and Grand Chamber judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, in English. Committee judgments are not reported: they apply well-established case-law to repetitive applications and are roughly two thirds of the Court's output by volume, so excluding them is a large omission and is stated here rather than left to be discovered. Decisions on admissibility, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries are not reported either. Where the Court found a violation on one limb of an article and none on another, that is reported as appearing in both findings; neither half is ever stated without the other. Case names are reproduced as the Court publishes them, including where they name an applicant and where the Court has anonymised one. This service makes no separate anonymisation decision. A judgment establishes what the Court decided on a date. It does not establish anything about the underlying events beyond the Court's own findings, it does not report what either party argued, and a Chamber judgment may still be referred to the Grand Chamber.

If something here is wrong, write to [email protected] quoting the record identifier above. Corrections are recorded on this page, not made silently.